Saturday, April 27, 2019

Is the Meaning of Words Black and White?

Sometimes we say what we mean, but more often than not, we don't mean what we say. After all, how many times a day do we say stuff that we don't actually mean?

In a lot of my AP classes, people will say things like "I literally cried for two hours because of this class," which -- given that the classes are APs -- is possible, but not very probable. While it is true that many people use indirect speech to "establish relationships" or out of "ordinary politeness," I would argue that we -- as people from Gen Z -- use it more so to convey the exact meaning of what we truly want to say. Often, we cannot find words to correctly express the way we feel, so we use indirect speech to convey our feelings instead. Think about it, how many internet posts actually say what they mean?
For example, the post from above is not truly calling people that dog-ear pages Satan, but rather expressing its strong dislike for people that participate in that activity. However, by using language that indirectly implies this meaning allows the creator of the post to truly show the viewer what he or she means.
The post above is another perfect example of indirect speech. It provides a metaphoric example to convey what this person feels. Of course they didn't actually start crying and "climb to the top of the Empire State Building singing," but when he or she says this, every single Gen Zer knows exactly what he or she meant. Immediately we all reply with "same" or something of the sort because we understand even though they didn't say exactly what they felt.

The usage of indirect speech is differs in each interaction. What I mean is that when a Gen Zer talks to his/her peers, the examples shown above are used. However, we understand that that usage is reserved for Gen Zers only and will switch to using indirect speech for politeness when speaking to someone from a different generation.

Indirect speech was relevant and useful before 2007 and in 2007 when Steven Pinker wrote "Words Don't Mean What They Mean," before 2007. It continues to be relevant today, although in a slightly different manner and will continue to be relevant in the future. The usage of this speech is the only thing that changes in the sense of what it is used to convey (politeness in 2007 and self-expression today). It will evolve for as long as our language and we ourselves evolve.

4 comments:

  1. I like how you connected Steven Pinker's argument to things we see in everyday life with examples. It's interesting that so many internet posts are indirect because I never really thought of it that way.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This was a very interesting post! I really liked how you thought outside the box and connected what we did in class to memes online. I never would have thought about that connection so thanks for bringing it to my attention!

    ReplyDelete
  3. This post has hilarious visuals! I love how the integration of visual and text.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Ankita! I love the perspective that you took on Pinker's piece and the connection you created between it and our generation. It's funny to reflect on how dramatic many of these online posts can be, but at the same time, the indirect speech they employ is effective since we understand exactly what the poster is trying to convey. Very creative post!

    ReplyDelete